Dover Forest EBS: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (AWB add cat events) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<strong>''Duplicate of | <strong>''Duplicate of [https://politicalsg.com/wiki/Dover_Forest_EIA] </strong> | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Environmental Baseline Study (EBS) for Dover Forest}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Environmental Baseline Study (EBS) for Dover Forest}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The Environmental Baseline Study for Dover Forest highlighted significant impacts resulting from the clearing of the site for residential development. These include irreversible changes to biodiversity, hydrology, and ecosystem functions. | The Environmental Baseline Study for Dover Forest highlighted significant impacts resulting from the clearing of the site for residential development. These include irreversible changes to biodiversity, hydrology, and ecosystem functions. | ||
== | == Loss of Vegetation and Habitat == | ||
=== | === Vegetation Types === | ||
The study identified 12 vegetation types within Dover Forest, which included: | The study identified 12 vegetation types within Dover Forest, which included: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* The removal of rare native-dominated vegetation patches that could have supported natural regeneration of native flora. | * The removal of rare native-dominated vegetation patches that could have supported natural regeneration of native flora. | ||
=== | === Conservation-Significant Flora === | ||
* Among the surveyed flora, 12.5% were classified as threatened. This included: | * Among the surveyed flora, 12.5% were classified as threatened. This included: | ||
** Critically endangered species such as ''Ficus virens'' (with a girth of 1,099 cm). | ** Critically endangered species such as ''Ficus virens'' (with a girth of 1,099 cm). | ||
** Mature ''Aphanamixis polystachya'' (endangered) and ''Durio zibethinus'' (durian trees), remnants of historical kampung cultivation. | ** Mature ''Aphanamixis polystachya'' (endangered) and ''Durio zibethinus'' (durian trees), remnants of historical kampung cultivation. | ||
* Large significant trees, crucial for carbon sequestration and habitat provision, were removed during clearance. | * Large significant trees, crucial for carbon sequestration and habitat provision, were removed during clearance. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | == Loss of Faunal Habitats == | ||
The forest supported 158 faunal species, including: | The forest supported 158 faunal species, including: | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | == Hydrological Impacts == | ||
The EBS identified critical hydrological features within the site: | The EBS identified critical hydrological features within the site: | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | == Decrease in Ecosystem Services == | ||
The study emphasized Dover Forest's contributions to: | The study emphasized Dover Forest's contributions to: | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | == Vegetation Condition and Degradation == | ||
Based on vegetation condition assessments: | Based on vegetation condition assessments: | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | == Species-Specific Impacts == | ||
* '''Monodominant Forest Areas''': The dominance of species like ''Hevea brasiliensis'' (rubber trees) and ''Falcataria moluccana'' reflected the forest’s history as an abandoned plantation. These areas, while less biodiverse, provided a refuge for fauna. | * '''Monodominant Forest Areas''': The dominance of species like ''Hevea brasiliensis'' (rubber trees) and ''Falcataria moluccana'' reflected the forest’s history as an abandoned plantation. These areas, while less biodiverse, provided a refuge for fauna. | ||
* '''Edge Effects''': Clearing activity increased edge effects, promoting invasive species like ''Mimosa diplotricha'' and reducing habitat quality for native flora and fauna. | * '''Edge Effects''': Clearing activity increased edge effects, promoting invasive species like ''Mimosa diplotricha'' and reducing habitat quality for native flora and fauna. | ||
[[Category:Events]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:14, 8 February 2025
Duplicate of [1]
The Environmental Baseline Study (EBS), commissioned by the Housing & Development Board (HDB) and conducted by AECOM, provides a comprehensive assessment of Dover Forest's ecological and environmental significance before its clearance for urban development.
The study aimed to evaluate the diversity of flora and fauna, hydrological conditions, and the overall environmental health of the area to guide development plans while addressing conservation concerns.
The Environmental Baseline Study for Dover Forest highlighted significant impacts resulting from the clearing of the site for residential development. These include irreversible changes to biodiversity, hydrology, and ecosystem functions.
Loss of Vegetation and Habitat
Vegetation Types
The study identified 12 vegetation types within Dover Forest, which included:
- Abandoned Land Forest (49.25%): Comprising plantation remnants (Hevea brasiliensis) and kampung-derived forest with mature fruiting and decorative trees.
- Native-dominated Secondary Forest (8.78%): A mix of early successional species, including Macaranga gigantea and Ficus fistulosa.
- Riparian Vegetation (1.41%): Found near streams and drainage lines, crucial for water filtration and aquatic ecosystems.
The clearance led to:
- Permanent loss of approximately 91.2% of secondary forested areas and other vegetation types.
- The removal of rare native-dominated vegetation patches that could have supported natural regeneration of native flora.
Conservation-Significant Flora
- Among the surveyed flora, 12.5% were classified as threatened. This included:
- Critically endangered species such as Ficus virens (with a girth of 1,099 cm).
- Mature Aphanamixis polystachya (endangered) and Durio zibethinus (durian trees), remnants of historical kampung cultivation.
- Large significant trees, crucial for carbon sequestration and habitat provision, were removed during clearance.
Loss of Faunal Habitats
The forest supported 158 faunal species, including:
- 82 bird species: Notable species like the Changeable Hawk-Eagle (Nisaetus cirrhatus) and Violet Cuckoo (Chrysococcyx xanthorhynchus), which are classified as endangered or vulnerable.
- 8 mammal species: Including the Sunda Pangolin (Manis javanica), a critically endangered species in Singapore.
- 11 reptile species and 8 amphibian species, many of which rely on riparian zones and secondary forests.
- Aquatic fauna: Streams within the forest provided habitats for rare native Apple Snails (Pila scutata) and other aquatic invertebrates.
The forest's role as a wildlife corridor was diminished, disrupting species movement and reducing overall habitat connectivity. The presence of forest specialists like the Glossy Swiftlet (Collocalia esculenta) underscored the importance of the area for ecological diversity.
Hydrological Impacts
The EBS identified critical hydrological features within the site:
- Streams and Drainage: Four earth streams and one canal (Ulu Pandan Canal) ran through the forest, contributing to stormwater management.
- Stagnant water in some streams supported unique aquatic biodiversity, but clearance disrupted these habitats.
- Water Quality: Streams originating from dense vegetation showed better oxygenation and lower temperatures, essential for maintaining aquatic life.
The clearing of forest vegetation increased surface runoff, sedimentation, and potential flooding risks in nearby areas, reducing the effectiveness of natural water filtration systems.
Decrease in Ecosystem Services
The study emphasized Dover Forest's contributions to:
- Carbon Sequestration: Mature trees, especially large ones like Ficus virens, provided substantial carbon storage. Their removal reduced local carbon absorption capacity.
- Temperature Regulation: Dense canopy cover helped cool the microclimate, mitigating urban heat. The clearance heightened the urban heat island effect.
- Pollution Filtration: Vegetation played a critical role in improving air quality by filtering particulates and pollutants, which is now lost.
Vegetation Condition and Degradation
Based on vegetation condition assessments:
- 44.95% of the forest was classified as "Good," retaining all vegetation layers with diminished species richness.
- Only 0.75% was rated "Very Good," consisting of rare native-dominated forest patches.
- 43.81% of the site was already degraded due to historical land use, but further clearing exacerbated the loss of ecological potential.
Species-Specific Impacts
- Monodominant Forest Areas: The dominance of species like Hevea brasiliensis (rubber trees) and Falcataria moluccana reflected the forest’s history as an abandoned plantation. These areas, while less biodiverse, provided a refuge for fauna.
- Edge Effects: Clearing activity increased edge effects, promoting invasive species like Mimosa diplotricha and reducing habitat quality for native flora and fauna.