Ridout Road rentals

The Ridout Road rental investigation was an inquiry conducted in Singapore in 2023 into the leases of state-owned bungalows by two senior ministers, K. Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan, members of the People's Action Party (PAP).

The properties, located at 26 and 31 Ridout Road, were rented following processes managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which oversees government-owned properties.

The investigation, launched by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) under the direction of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, aimed to determine if there was any abuse of power or conflict of interest. An independent review, led by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, was also conducted. Both the CPIB and Teo concluded that there was no evidence of wrongdoing or undue benefit.

Background

Ridout Road is part of the affluent Bukit Timah area and is designated by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) as a "Good Class Bungalow Area," one of Singapore's most exclusive residential zones. The bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road had been vacant for extended periods before being rented by Shanmugam and Balakrishnan, respectively.

Allegations and Initial Responses

On 6 May 2023, Kenneth Jeyaretnam, secretary-general of the Reform Party, published a blog post questioning how the ministers could afford the high rents associated with the Ridout Road properties. He also called for greater transparency in the SLA's leasing process, particularly given that Shanmugam oversaw the SLA as Minister for Law.

The SLA issued a statement on 12 May 2023, affirming that the rental of both properties adhered to established procedures.

Jeyaretnam also raised concerns about alleged links between the transactions and Livspace, an interior design firm led by Shanmugam’s son. Both Livspace and Shanmugam strongly denied these claims, labelling them baseless and defamatory.

Investigation Initiation

On 23 May 2023, Prime Minister Lee announced that he had requested reports from relevant agencies and tasked Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean with conducting an independent review. Additionally, the CPIB initiated an investigation to examine the allegations.

Investigation Findings

Property Details

The bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road were state-owned properties managed by the SLA. Both had been vacant for several years before the ministers’ leases.

26 Ridout Road (Shanmugam):
- Vacant since December 2013.
- The property was rented in June 2018 for S$26,500 per month, with the lease renewed in 2021 at the same rate. The lease was renewed again in 2024, but the revised rental amount is unknown.
- Shanmugam paid over S$400,000 for renovations, including S$61,400 for a car porch.
- The SLA incurred S$515,400 for essential repairs. Concerns about overgrown land adjacent to the property led Shanmugam to offer to clear and maintain the area at his own cost, citing public health risks. The SLA assessed that the land could only be maintained if it was included in the tenancy, resulting in an increase of the property’s size to 23,164 square metres (249,340 sq ft).
The clearance cost of S$172,000 was initially paid by the SLA but recovered through Shanmugam’s rent. Shanmugam also paid an additional S$25,000 annually to maintain the adjacent land.
31 Ridout Road (Balakrishnan):
- Vacant since July 2013.
- Rented in October 2019 for S$19,000 per month, revised to S$20,000 in 2022 upon lease renewal.
- Balakrishnan spent over S$200,000 on renovations.

CPIB and Independent Review

The CPIB report found "no evidence to suggest any abuse of position by the ministers for personal gain." The independent review by Teo concluded that:

Shanmugam’s identity as the prospective tenant of 26 Ridout Road was not disclosed to the SLA during negotiations.
Balakrishnan’s rental amount was comparable to other properties of similar condition.
Both leases complied with SLA procedures, and there was no abuse of power or conflict of interest.

Timeline

Parliamentary Debate

On 3 July 2023, a parliamentary session was convened to debate the findings.

K. Shanmugam stated that his residents judged him by his commitment to public service rather than his income or residence.
Vivian Balakrishnan emphasised that he had been "scrupulously careful" to ensure transparency and compliance with procedures.
Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh raised concerns about ministers requesting information for personal use, while MP Sylvia Lim questioned the propriety of the transactions.