2011 General Election: Difference between revisions

m
AWB prepend template navbar-elections
No edit summary
m (AWB prepend template navbar-elections)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Navbar-elections}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:2011 Singapore General Election}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:2011 Singapore General Election}}


Line 131: Line 132:
==General election campaign==
==General election campaign==
===Televised forum===
===Televised forum===
In the first pre-election forum of this nature in Singapore since the 1988 General Election, [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Channel_NewsAsia Channel NewsAsia] invited the main parties to record an hour-long programme.  The programme, in English entitled, “A political forum on Singapore’s future” brought together the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) and four opposition parties to discuss long and short-term challenges for the country. <ref>{{cite web | title=MediaCorp presents a political forum on Singapore's future | website=Mediacorp website | url=http://www.mediacorp.sg/en/media/EDC110330-0000661/MediaCorp%20presents%20a%20political%20forum | accessdate=3 April 2011 | url-status=dead | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110406044926/http://www.mediacorp.sg/en/media/EDC110330-0000661/MediaCorp%20presents%20a%20political%20forum | archivedate=6 April 2011 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> The forum included:
In the first pre-election forum of this nature in Singapore since the 1988 General Election, [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Channel_NewsAsia Channel NewsAsia] invited the main parties to record an hour-long programme.  The programme, in English entitled, “A political forum on Singapore’s future” brought together the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) and four opposition parties to discuss long and short-term challenges for the country.<ref>{{cite web | title=MediaCorp presents a political forum on Singapore's future | website=Mediacorp website | url=http://www.mediacorp.sg/en/media/EDC110330-0000661/MediaCorp%20presents%20a%20political%20forum | accessdate=3 April 2011 | url-status=dead | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110406044926/http://www.mediacorp.sg/en/media/EDC110330-0000661/MediaCorp%20presents%20a%20political%20forum | archivedate=6 April 2011 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> The forum included:
*[https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Singapore_Democratic_Party Singapore Democratic Party], represented by its Assistant Treasurer Dr [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Vincent_Wijeysingha Vincent Wijeysingha];
*[https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Singapore_Democratic_Party Singapore Democratic Party], represented by its Assistant Treasurer Dr [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Vincent_Wijeysingha Vincent Wijeysingha];
*[https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Singapore_People's_Party Singapore People's Party], represented by 2nd Vice Chairwoman [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Lina_Chiam Lina Chiam];
*[https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Singapore_People's_Party Singapore People's Party], represented by 2nd Vice Chairwoman [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Lina_Chiam Lina Chiam];
Line 150: Line 151:
Vincent Wijeysingha rejected his comments stating, "We've been a very open party and we're very clear."<ref name="Faris1">{{cite news|last=Mokhtar|first=Faris|title=SDP, PAP clash over mystery videoe|url=http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/sdp-hits-back-pap-criticisms-141142593.html|accessdate=9 August 2011|newspaper=[[Yahoo News]]|date=24 April 2011}}</ref>
Vincent Wijeysingha rejected his comments stating, "We've been a very open party and we're very clear."<ref name="Faris1">{{cite news|last=Mokhtar|first=Faris|title=SDP, PAP clash over mystery videoe|url=http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/sdp-hits-back-pap-criticisms-141142593.html|accessdate=9 August 2011|newspaper=[[Yahoo News]]|date=24 April 2011}}</ref>


This incident was cited in an article published in [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Economist The Economist] criticising the ruling party's election strategy<ref name="economist">{{cite news|title=Low expectations|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18681827?story_id=18681827&fsrc=rss|accessdate=12 May 2011|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|date=12 May 2011}}</ref> [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_New_Paper The New Paper] released a story next day, with the headline: Is Singapore ready for a GAY MP?"<ref>{{cite news|last=Sim Bryna|first=Melvin Singh|title=Is Singapore ready for a GAY MP?|url=http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp|accessdate=26 April 2011|newspaper=[[The New Paper]]|date=16 May 2011|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428141427/http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp|archivedate=28 April 2011|df=dmy-all}}</ref>  [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Kenneth_Jeyaretnam Kenneth Jeyaretnam] of the [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Reform_Party_(Singapore) Reform Party] called Balakrishnan's campaign a "low attack." <ref name="accusation" />
This incident was cited in an article published in [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Economist The Economist] criticising the ruling party's election strategy<ref name="economist2">{{cite news|title=Low expectations|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18681827?story_id=18681827&fsrc=rss|accessdate=12 May 2011|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|date=12 May 2011}}</ref> [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_New_Paper The New Paper] released a story next day, with the headline: Is Singapore ready for a GAY MP?"<ref>{{cite news|last=Sim Bryna|first=Melvin Singh|title=Is Singapore ready for a GAY MP?|url=http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp|accessdate=26 April 2011|newspaper=[[The New Paper]]|date=16 May 2011|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428141427/http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp|archivedate=28 April 2011|df=dmy-all}}</ref>  [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Kenneth_Jeyaretnam Kenneth Jeyaretnam] of the [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Reform_Party_(Singapore) Reform Party] called Balakrishnan's campaign a "low attack." <ref name="accusation" />


Balakrishnan received widespread controversy and criticism online for his remark,.<ref name="drama">{{cite news|last=Paulo|first=Derrick|title=Drama over video, YOG and economic policies|url=http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110507-0000027/Drama-over-video,-YOG-and-economic-policies|accessdate=12 May 2011|newspaper=Today Online|date=7 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120609145108/http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110507-0000027/Drama-over-video,-YOG-and-economic-policies|archive-date=9 June 2012|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> On 28 April, he told the press: "there is "no need" to further discuss [the] video". He said that his question was a "legitimate".<ref name="Faris2">{{cite news|last=Mokhtar|first=Faris|title=Vivian Balakrishnan: Let's not talk about the video anymore|url=http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/dr-vivian-let-not-talk-video-anymore-173058828.html|accessdate=16 May 2011|newspaper=[[Yahoo News]]|date=28 April 2011}}</ref>
Balakrishnan received widespread controversy and criticism online for his remark,.<ref name="drama">{{cite news|last=Paulo|first=Derrick|title=Drama over video, YOG and economic policies|url=http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110507-0000027/Drama-over-video,-YOG-and-economic-policies|accessdate=12 May 2011|newspaper=Today Online|date=7 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120609145108/http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110507-0000027/Drama-over-video,-YOG-and-economic-policies|archive-date=9 June 2012|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> On 28 April, he told the press: "there is "no need" to further discuss [the] video". He said that his question was a "legitimate".<ref name="Faris2">{{cite news|last=Mokhtar|first=Faris|title=Vivian Balakrishnan: Let's not talk about the video anymore|url=http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/dr-vivian-let-not-talk-video-anymore-173058828.html|accessdate=16 May 2011|newspaper=[[Yahoo News]]|date=28 April 2011}}</ref>
Line 393: Line 394:
==Legacy==
==Legacy==
===Use of social media===
===Use of social media===
The election saw a heavier use of social and online media compared to [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/2006_Singapore_general_election 2006 Singapore general election], especially to evade [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Censorship_in_Singapore censorship in Singapore]. It is widely perceived by the populace that the major state-run newspapers and broadcasters "align[ed] itself with the party's ideals and decisions" and that the electoral system was tilted against the Opposition.<ref name="economist2">{{cite news|title=Low expectations|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18681827?story_id=18681827&fsrc=rss|accessdate=12 May 2011|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|date=12 May 2011}}</ref> It had been difficult to create alternative media until the rise of sites such as [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Online_Citizen The Online Citizen] and such internet tools such as Facebook, Twitter and blogs, which saw increased significance in the 2006 elections but became especially prominent in the 2011 elections. <ref name="CNNGoFang">{{cite news|last=Fang|first=Charlene|title=Why this Singapore General Election is important|url=http://www.cnngo.com/singapore/life/tell-me-about-it/charlene-fang-why-singapore-general-election-important-447421|accessdate=7 August 2011|newspaper=CNNGo|date=7 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110809195526/http://www.cnngo.com/singapore/life/tell-me-about-it/charlene-fang-why-singapore-general-election-important-447421|archive-date=9 August 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Economist The Economist], the PAP's aggressive modernisation of Singapore created "one of the world's most wired societies," leading to new media that "transformed" the electoral scene in Singapore. Characterising the state-run mainstream press as "docile", the Economist also argued that this also forced significantly more news coverage of the Opposition than in previous elections, since the mainstream media feared their readership deserting them.<ref name="economist2" /> One blogger from [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/CNN CNN] wrote, "Thanks to social media, it doesn’t matter that the country’s largely state-run media leans towards reporting the actions of the PAP, no one’s reading anyway.".<ref name="CNNGoFang" /> The Economist however was more cynical in its analysis of the election: "in Singapore, winning 7% of parliamentary seats is tantamount to an opposition triumph".<ref name="economist2" />
The election saw a heavier use of social and online media compared to [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/2006_Singapore_general_election 2006 Singapore general election], especially to evade [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Censorship_in_Singapore censorship in Singapore]. It is widely perceived by the populace that the major state-run newspapers and broadcasters "align[ed] itself with the party's ideals and decisions" and that the electoral system was tilted against the Opposition.<ref name="economist2"/> It had been difficult to create alternative media until the rise of sites such as [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Online_Citizen The Online Citizen] and such internet tools such as Facebook, Twitter and blogs, which saw increased significance in the 2006 elections but became especially prominent in the 2011 elections.<ref name="CNNGoFang">{{cite news|last=Fang|first=Charlene|title=Why this Singapore General Election is important|url=http://www.cnngo.com/singapore/life/tell-me-about-it/charlene-fang-why-singapore-general-election-important-447421|accessdate=7 August 2011|newspaper=CNNGo|date=7 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110809195526/http://www.cnngo.com/singapore/life/tell-me-about-it/charlene-fang-why-singapore-general-election-important-447421|archive-date=9 August 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Economist The Economist], the PAP's aggressive modernisation of Singapore created "one of the world's most wired societies," leading to new media that "transformed" the electoral scene in Singapore. Characterising the state-run mainstream press as "docile", the Economist also argued that this also forced significantly more news coverage of the Opposition than in previous elections, since the mainstream media feared their readership deserting them.<ref name="economist2" /> One blogger from [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/CNN CNN] wrote, "Thanks to social media, it doesn’t matter that the country’s largely state-run media leans towards reporting the actions of the PAP, no one’s reading anyway.".<ref name="CNNGoFang" /> The Economist however was more cynical in its analysis of the election: "in Singapore, winning 7% of parliamentary seats is tantamount to an opposition triumph".<ref name="economist2" />
===The first election in which a GRC was won by the Opposition===
===The first election in which a GRC was won by the Opposition===
Traditionally regarded as a PAP "fortress", a GRC fell to the opposition for the first time in Singapore's political history. In previous elections, the Opposition had never won a GRC, which ostensibly ensure minority representation in parliament but also shut out smaller opposition parties with less resources. GRCs comprise over 86% of the seats, but the Opposition in previous elections would contest "less than half the seats". The election saw the most extensive use of co-ordination to avoid "three-cornered fights" and was also notable for seeing "two veteran MPs" making immense risks by choosing to contest in GRCs rather than their historical SMC strongholds.<ref name="economist2" />
Traditionally regarded as a PAP "fortress", a GRC fell to the opposition for the first time in Singapore's political history. In previous elections, the Opposition had never won a GRC, which ostensibly ensure minority representation in parliament but also shut out smaller opposition parties with less resources. GRCs comprise over 86% of the seats, but the Opposition in previous elections would contest "less than half the seats". The election saw the most extensive use of co-ordination to avoid "three-cornered fights" and was also notable for seeing "two veteran MPs" making immense risks by choosing to contest in GRCs rather than their historical SMC strongholds.<ref name="economist2" />
Line 404: Line 405:
===Further retirements===
===Further retirements===
Both losing ministers in Aljunied GRC, [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/George_Yeo George Yeo] and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Lim_Hwee_Hua Lim Hwee Hua], announced their retirements from politics in separate news conferences given in the days after the election.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_666950.html|title=George Yeo exiting politics, will not run for Presidency|last=Li|first=Xueying|date=11 May 2011|work=Straits Times|accessdate=13 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110513060832/http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_666950.html|archive-date=13 May 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_667375.html|title=Lim Hwee Hua will not contest next election|date=11 May 2011|work=Straits Times|accessdate=13 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512191013/http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_667375.html|archive-date=12 May 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>  George Yeo, who remained popular online and continued to have "a flood of support" after the election and had been repeatedly urged to contest the next election, or even contest the [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/2011_Singaporean_presidential_election 2011 Singaporean presidential election] turned his supporters down, declaring, "I'm a free spirit, and I don't think I'm temperamentally suited for such a job."
Both losing ministers in Aljunied GRC, [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/George_Yeo George Yeo] and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Lim_Hwee_Hua Lim Hwee Hua], announced their retirements from politics in separate news conferences given in the days after the election.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_666950.html|title=George Yeo exiting politics, will not run for Presidency|last=Li|first=Xueying|date=11 May 2011|work=Straits Times|accessdate=13 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110513060832/http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_666950.html|archive-date=13 May 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_667375.html|title=Lim Hwee Hua will not contest next election|date=11 May 2011|work=Straits Times|accessdate=13 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512191013/http://www.straitstimes.com/GeneralElection/News/Story/STIStory_667375.html|archive-date=12 May 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>  George Yeo, who remained popular online and continued to have "a flood of support" after the election and had been repeatedly urged to contest the next election, or even contest the [https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/2011_Singaporean_presidential_election 2011 Singaporean presidential election] turned his supporters down, declaring, "I'm a free spirit, and I don't think I'm temperamentally suited for such a job."
==References==
{{Reflist}}


[[Category:Elections]]
[[Category:Elections]]
Bots, editors
810

edits